Gonzalez v. City of San Antonio
Douglas Carillo Gonzalez |
City of San Antonio |
5:2024cv00902 |
August 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Orlando L Garcia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order Jointly Filed by Plaintiff and by City of San Antonio. (Wilson, Natalie) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 Defendant's (I) ANSWER to #1 Complaint and (II) Affirmative Defenses by City of San Antonio.(Jones, Fred) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Douglas Carillo Gonzalez. City of San Antonio served on 8/26/2024, answer due 9/16/2024. (Hatfield Asel, Kennedy) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to City of San Antonio. (mgr) |
Case assigned to Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (mgr) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Douglas Carillo Gonzalez. (Hatfield Asel, Kennedy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-19109968), filed by Douglas Carillo Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Hatfield Asel, Kennedy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.