The Cincinnati Indemnity Company v. NEXT Insurance US Company
| The Cincinnati Indemnity Company |
| NEXT Insurance US Company |
| 5:2024cv00917 |
| August 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Richard B Farrer |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: NEXT Insurance US Company answer due 10/28/2024. (rqr) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #1 Complaint. Entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. The deadline for Defendant to respond is hereby extended to October 28, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cjlc)
|
| Filing 6 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by NEXT Insurance US Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ORDER GRANTING NEXT INSURANCE US COMPANYS AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Gauntt, J.) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (wg)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (bot2)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to NEXT Insurance US Company. (wg) |
| Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (wg) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by The Cincinnati Indemnity Company. (Talbot, Lisa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-19114793), filed by The Cincinnati Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet JS-44, #6 Summons)(Talbot, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Cincinnati Indemnity Company v. NEXT Insurance US Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NEXT Insurance US Company | |
| Represented By: | J. Chad Gauntt |
| Represented By: | Christopher Surber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Indemnity Company | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Brindle Talbot |
| Represented By: | Jennifer L Kelley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
