Garces v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Matthew Andrew Garces
Defendant: Josh Smith, John Doe Marshal 1, John Doe Marshals 2-5 and Ronald Davis
Case Number: 5:2025cv00607
Filed: June 2, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER--For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Matthew Andrew Garcess Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims and this case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.Ordinarily, a pro se litigant should be offered an opportunity to amend his complaint before it is dismissed. Rule 15(a) provides that leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires. The language of this rule evinces a bias in favor of granting leave to amend. Granting leave to amend, however, is not required if the plaintiff has already pleaded [his] best case. Wiggins v. Louisiana State Univ.-Health Care Servs. Div., 710 F. Appx 625, 627 (5th Cir. 2017) (citations omitted). Here, the filing of any amended complaint would be futile.. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (vnd)
September 12, 2025 Filing 14 OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 12) AND EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS by Matthew Andrew Garces. (vl)
September 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT, CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (vnd)
September 10, 2025 Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Matthew Andrew Garces. Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (vnd)
August 12, 2025 Filing 11 PRO SE LITIGANTS EMERGENCY OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE BEMPORADS AUGUST 11, 2025 TEXT ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT STAY (vl)
August 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #10 Motion to Lift Stay entered by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. The request to lift the stay in this case is DENIED. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (HJB)
August 10, 2025 Filing 10 Emergency Objection to Judge Rodriguez's July 22, 2025 Text Order and MOTION to Lift Stay by Matthew Andrew Garces.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (vl)
July 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #2 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (vl)
July 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #6 Motion for Recusal entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Under 28 U.S.C. 455(a), recusal is not warranted. A reasonable and objective person would not harbor doubts concerning Magistrate Judge Bemporad's impartiality in this case.See United States v. Rhodes, 332 F. Supp. 2d 965, 967 (N.D. Tex. 2004) ("Judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion," "[a] court should not allow 455(a) to be used as a vehicle for an attorney to pick and choose the judge who will preside over a case he is handling," and "the statute [does not] require recusal on a mere unsubstantiated suggestion of personal bias or prejudice." (citations omitted)). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mmlc)
July 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #8 Motion for TRO entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. As Judge Pulliam explained in an order denying Plaintiff's identical motion, "[t]he instant motion is utterly frivolous. While Rule 65 provides a means to enjoin action of adverse parties in litigation, it has no applicability to enjoin action by a Magistrate Judge assigned to the case." Garces v. Torrez et al., 25-CV-604 (ECF No. 17). Accordingly, "[t]he Court DENIES the motion and WARNS Plaintiff that should he persist with abusive or frivolous filings the Court may issue sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this case, requiring a monetary sanction payable to the Court, and/or issuing an appropriate, pre-filing injunction relative to this case or to litigation in the Western District of Texas." Id. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cwlc)
July 20, 2025 Filing 8 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Matthew Andrew Garces.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (vl)
July 20, 2025 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #6 MOTION for Recusal by Matthew Andrew Garces. (vl)
June 20, 2025 Motions No Longer Referred: #6 MOTION for Recusal (mgr)
June 20, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION for Recusal of Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad by Matthew Andrew Garces. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F, #2 Exhibit G). . (vl) Modified on 7/23/2025, to remove referred motion (mgr).
June 13, 2025 Filing 5 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Matthew Andrew Garces. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(vl)
June 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER STAYING CASE--It is ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending the District Court's consideration of the undersigned's June 4, 2024, Report and Recommendation in Garces v. Rossback, et al. SA-25-cv-441-JKP. Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (Attachments: #1 Report and Recommendation)(bt)
June 4, 2025 Filing 3 Case Opening Letter TO Matthew Andrew Garces. (dtg)
June 2, 2025 Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Matthew Andrew Garces. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (dtg)
June 2, 2025 Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Andrew Garces. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons). Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (dtg)
June 2, 2025 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (dtg)
June 2, 2025 THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (dtg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garces v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Andrew Garces
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Josh Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Marshal 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Marshals 2-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?