Hernandez v. Baylor University Board of Regents et al
| Jasmin Hernandez |
| Baylor University Board of Regents, Art Briles and Ian McCaw |
| 6:2016cv00069 |
| March 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Waco Office |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER GRANTING 97 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (tb)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER GRANTING 94 Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Party. Pursuant to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Tevin S. Elliott is hereby designated as a responsible third party with respect to Plaintiffs state-law claims. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (tb)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER GRANTING IN PART re 87 Opposed MOTION for Protective Order. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent Baylor seeks an order quashing the Notice of Videotaped Deposition of Reagan Ramsower dated February 23, 2017, (Dkt. 87-2). With respect to Bay lors request for the entry of a protective order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Jasmin Hernandez and Defendants Briles and McCaw file a response on or before March 10, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Baylor file its reply on or before March 14, 2017. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (tb)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER GRANTING 76 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (tb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
