Cotton v. Texas Express Pipeline, LLC. et al
| Anthony Cotton |
| All Others Doing Business As Texas Express Pipeline, LLC, DCP Midstream Texas Express, LLC, Enbridge Midcoast Energy, LP, Enterprise Products Operating, LLC., Enterprise Products Partners, LP, Texas Express Pipeline, LLC. and WGR Asset Holding Company |
| 6:2016cv00453 |
| December 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Waco Office |
| Jeffrey C. Manske |
| Robert Pitman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND NOT ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Re 25 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 21 Motion for Leave to File Document filed by Anthony Cotton, DENYING 23 Motion to Amend Complaint filed by Anthony Cotto n, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING INPART 13 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Texas Express Pipeline, LLC., DCP Midstream Texas Express, LLC, Enterprise Products Operating, LLC., Enterprise Products Partners, LP, WGR Asset Holding Company, En bridge Midcoast Energy, LP. For the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Manskes report and recommendation, (Dkt. 25), is ADOPTED IN PART AND NOT ADOPTED IN PART. Specifically, the Court ADOPTS the report and recommendations fi ndings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to every cause of action in Cottons complaint except for his breach of contract claim. However, the Court REJECTS the magistrate judges analysis andrecommendation concerning the breach of contract c laim. Defendants Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 13), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the Court GRANTS Defendants motion with respect to all of Cottons causes of action other than his breach of contract claim; those claims are DISMI SSED. However, the Court DENIES Defendants motion with respect to Cottons breach of contract claim. Finally, the Court DENIES Cottons Motions to Amend, (Dkts. 21, 23), without prejudice to filing a motion to amend pertaining only to Cottons remaining breach of contract claim. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jgb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
