Kirven v. Davis
Petitioner: Otis Dwayne Kirven
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Case Number: 6:2018cv00188
Filed: July 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: Waco Office
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2018 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Otis Dwayne Kirven. (jch)
July 11, 2018 Filing 2 Letter/Correspondence to Otis Dwayne Kirven advising of receipt of case, case number, and generic case information. (jch)
July 11, 2018 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Otis Dwayne Kirven.(jch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirven v. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Represented By: Adham Ramzi Bissar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Otis Dwayne Kirven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?