Arunachalam v. Intuit, Inc.
Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam and Lakshmi Arunachalam |
Intuit, Inc |
6:2019cv00172 |
February 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or Alternatively Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California by Intuit, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion to Transfer or Dismiss)(Sacksteder, Michael) |
Filing 16 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Intuit, Inc. (Sacksteder, Michael) |
Filing 15 Filing fee received in the amount of $400, receipt number 600024699 (lad) |
Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint ,, Filing Fees of $400 for Exxon Mobil Complaint and $400 for Intuit Complaint paid on April 5, 2019, with Priority Express Tracking Number at the U.S. Post Office, EE 498 191 930 US by Lakshmi Arunachalam. (Arunachalam, Lakshmi) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lakshmi Arunachalam. Intuit, Inc served on 3/26/2019, answer due 4/16/2019. (Arunachalam, Lakshmi) |
Text Order GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #12 Motion entered by Judge Alan D Albright. After consideration the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion in part. Plaintiff shall have until April 10, 2019, to pay the filing fee. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sb) |
Filing 12 MOTION PLAINTIFFS FRCP RULE 6(b)(1)(A) MOTION, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, TO EXTEND TIME UNTIL 4/12/19 FOR PLAINTIFF TO PAY $400 FILING FEE AS PER THIS COURTS 3/20/19 ORDER (D.I.10) AND 3/25/19 TEXT ORDER, DENYING MY MOTION TO RECONSIDER ITS ORDER DENYING MY IFP MOTION, Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam's Declaration in support thereof, Proposed Order and Certificate of Service by Lakshmi Arunachalam. (Arunachalam, Lakshmi) |
Text Order MOOTING #11 Motion entered by Judge Alan D Albright. This Court has previously denied Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider; therefore, the instant Motion is MOOT. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sb) |
Filing 11 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THIS COURT TO RULE ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO RECONSIDER ITS 3/1/19 ORDER D.I.7 DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, TO PAY THE $400 FILING FEE, PURSUANT TOFRCP RULE 6(b)(1), UNTIL AFTER THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES ON MY IFP MOTION IN CASE 18-7691, DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE OF 3/29/19, Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam's Declaration in support thereof, and Certificate of Service re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #10 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, #8 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam's Declaration in support thereof and Certificate of Service, #9 Supplemental Memorandum,,, #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lakshmi Arunachalam. (Arunachalam, Lakshmi) |
Filing 10 ORDER DENYING #8 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad) |
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to #8 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam's Declaration in support thereof and Certificate of Service SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO CLARIFY ANY CONFUSION IN THE MINDS OF THE COURT DUE TO DEFAMATION BY MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS AGAINST ME IN THEIR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE TO BIAS THE COURTS AGAINST ME IN CONSIDERING MY MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (IFP) by Lakshmi Arunachalam. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam's Reply Brief in SAP case in NDCa, #2 Exhibit Judge Alsup's Order in Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam's Case in NDCa, #3 Exhibit IP Opportunity Overview by Ron Laurie)(Arunachalam, Lakshmi) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam's Declaration in support thereof and Certificate of Service by Lakshmi Arunachalam. (Arunachalam, Lakshmi) |
Filing 7 ORDER DENYING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ORDERED that by March 26, 2019 Plaintiff shall pay a filing fee of $400.00. Plaintiff is admonished that failure by Plaintiff to pay the filing fee as ordered herein may lead to dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (tb) |
Text Order GRANTING #4 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically entered by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff the requisite paperwork so that she may sign up for electronic filing. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhg) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Intuit, Inc. (tb) |
Filing 5 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Lakshmi Arunachalam. (tb) |
Filing 4 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Lakshmi Arunachalam. (tb) |
Filing 3 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (tb) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lakshmi Arunachalam. (tb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Lakshmi Arunachalam.(tb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.