Data Scape Limited v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
| Data Scape Limited |
| Verizon Connect, Inc., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS, Verizon Communications, Inc. and Cellco Partnership |
| 6:2019cv00174 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 100 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING #14 Motion to Stay Case. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (td)
|
| Filing 14 Joint MOTION to Stay Case Pending Outcome of U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation by Data Scape Limited, Cellco Partnership, Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Connect, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mann, J.) Modified on 4/9/2019, to add filer (rf). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by J. Mark Mann on behalf of Cellco Partnership, Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Connect, Inc.. Attorney J. Mark Mann added to party Cellco Partnership(pty:dft), Attorney J. Mark Mann added to party Verizon Communications, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney J. Mark Mann added to party Verizon Connect, Inc.(pty:dft) (Mann, J.) |
| Notice of Correction: ****NOTIFIED COUNSEL THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN ADDED AS A FILER OF THIS DOCUMENT****re #14 Joint MOTION to Stay Case Pending Outcome of U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation. (rf) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #11 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Accordingly, Defendants deadline to respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to and including April 22, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lt)
|
| Reset Answer Deadline for All Defendants: deadline to respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to and including April 22, 2019. (lad) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Data Scape Limited. Verizon Communications, Inc. served on 3/19/2019, answer due 4/9/2019. (de la Fuente, Jose) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Data Scape Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(de la Fuente, Jose) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Data Scape Limited. Verizon Connect, Inc. served on 3/1/2019, answer due 3/22/2019. (de la Fuente, Jose) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Data Scape Limited. Cellco Partnership served on 2/28/2019, answer due 3/21/2019. (de la Fuente, Jose) |
| Filing 8 Court's Report on Patent sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (lad) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Verizon Connect, Inc. (lad) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS. (lad) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Verizon Communications, Inc. (lad) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Data Scape Limited. (de la Fuente, Jose) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Patent Report AO 120 form by Data Scape Limited (de la Fuente, Jose) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Data Scape Limited. (de la Fuente, Jose) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11815606), filed by Data Scape Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(de la Fuente, Jose) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
