Slingshot Printing LLC v. HP Inc.
Plaintiff: Slingshot Printing LLC
Defendant: HP Inc.
Case Number: 6:2019cv00363
Filed: June 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. The instant Motion is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended until and including August 22, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jw)
July 2, 2019 Reset Deadlines: HP Inc. answer due 8/22/2019. (lad)
July 1, 2019 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by HP Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry)
July 1, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry K. Shelton on behalf of HP Inc.. Attorney Barry K. Shelton added to party HP Inc.(pty:dft) (Shelton, Barry)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Richard Juang. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (dm)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Michael A. Siem. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (dm)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Chandran B. Iyer. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (dm)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Ronald M. Daignault. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (dm)
June 19, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12249120) by on behalf of Slingshot Printing LLC. (Mort, Raymond)
June 19, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12249113) by on behalf of Slingshot Printing LLC. (Mort, Raymond)
June 19, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12249103) by on behalf of Slingshot Printing LLC. (Mort, Raymond)
June 19, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Raymond W Mort, III ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12249095) by on behalf of Slingshot Printing LLC. (Mort, Raymond)
June 18, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Slingshot Printing LLC. HP Inc. served on 6/17/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (Mort, Raymond)
June 12, 2019 Filing 6 Letters to Attorneys Ronald Daignault, Chandran Iyer, Michael Siem, and Richard Juang re: non-admitted status. (lt)
June 12, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to HP Inc. (lt)
June 12, 2019 Filing 4 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office with copy of complaint. (lt)
June 11, 2019 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lt)
June 11, 2019 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Slingshot Printing LLC. (lt)
June 11, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Slingshot Printing LLC. (Mort, Raymond)
June 11, 2019 Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Slingshot Printing LLC. (Mort, Raymond)
June 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12218073), filed by Slingshot Printing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mort, Raymond)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slingshot Printing LLC v. HP Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HP Inc.
Represented By: Barry K. Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Slingshot Printing LLC
Represented By: Raymond W Mort, III
Represented By: Michael A. Siem
Represented By: Ronald M. Daignault
Represented By: Richard Juang
Represented By: Chandran B. Iyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?