ROKA Sports, Inc. v. Roka Fitness LLC
ROKA Sports, Inc. |
Roka Fitness LLC |
6:2019cv00365 |
June 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Closing Report on Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office with Notice of Dismissal. (lad) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ROKA Sports, Inc. (Cavazos, Edward) |
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING #10 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, PLEAD, OR OTHERWISE. Roka Fitness LLC answer due 8/5/2019. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer, Plead, or Otherwise Move by ROKA Sports, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cavazos, Edward) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Sarah Goetz for ROKA Sports, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ROKA Sports, Inc.. Roka Fitness LLC served on 6/13/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (Cavazos, Edward) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Edward A. Cavazos on behalf of Sarah Goetz ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12244057) by on behalf of ROKA Sports, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cavazos, Edward) |
Filing 6 Letter sent to Attorney Sarah A. Goetz re: non-admitted status. (lt) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Roka Fitness LLC. (lt) |
Filing 4 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office with copy of complaint. (lt) |
Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by ROKA Sports, Inc.. (Cavazos, Edward) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by ROKA Sports, Inc.. as to Roka Fitness LLC (Cavazos, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12219444), filed by ROKA Sports, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Errata B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Cavazos, Edward) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ROKA Sports, Inc. (lt) |
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ROKA Sports, Inc. v. Roka Fitness LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Roka Fitness LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ROKA Sports, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Brian Christopher Nash |
Represented By: | Edward A. Cavazos |
Represented By: | Sarah Goetz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.