NEODRON LTD. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
| NEODRON LTD., |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION |
| 6:2019cv00399 |
| June 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Opposed MOTION to Stay Case Pending ITC Determination by MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 23 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by MICROSOFT CORPORATION.(Shelton, Barry) |
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING #16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (am)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING #15 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (am)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (am)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (am)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (am)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John Michael Guaragna for Applicant David R. Knudson ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12442776) by on behalf of MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Guaragna, John) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John Michael Guaragna for Applicant Robert Williams ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12442590) by on behalf of MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Guaragna, John) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John Michael Guaragna for Applicant Erik R. Fuehrer ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12442473) by on behalf of MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Guaragna, John) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John Michael Guaragna for Applicant Erin P. Gibson ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12442367) by on behalf of MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Guaragna, John) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John Michael Guaragna for Applicant Sean C. Cunningham ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-12442249) by on behalf of MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Guaragna, John) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brian K. Erickson on behalf of MICROSOFT CORPORATION. Attorney Brian K. Erickson added to party MICROSOFT CORPORATION(pty:dft) (Erickson, Brian) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kristopher R. Davis on behalf of NEODRON LTD.,. Attorney Kristopher R. Davis added to party NEODRON LTD.,(pty:pla) (Davis, Kristopher) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry K. Shelton on behalf of MICROSOFT CORPORATION. Attorney Barry K. Shelton added to party MICROSOFT CORPORATION(pty:dft) (Shelton, Barry) |
| Reset Deadlines: MICROSOFT CORPORATION answer due 8/23/2019. (lad) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. The instant Motion is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended until and including August 23, 2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jw)
|
| Filing 7 Acknowledgment of Service returned by NEODRON LTD.,. MICROSOFT CORPORATION served on 7/3/2019, answer due 8/2/2019. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 6 Report on Patent sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (lad) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by NEODRON LTD.,. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of AO 120 Report Form by NEODRON LTD., (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by NEODRON LTD.,. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12295064), filed by NEODRON LTD.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mirzaie, Reza) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
