Jones v. Strong
| Powell Jones, Jr. |
| Warden Kelley Strong and Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis |
| 6:2019cv00478 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Powell Jones, Jr. re State Court Habeas Corpus. (lad) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing a proper writ of habeas corpus with the state court in compliance with #5 Order by Powell Jones, Jr (lad) |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Hold in Abeyance. Case is STAYED until further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Powell Jones, Jr. (lad) |
|
Filing 3
Deficiency ORDER. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (Attachments: #1 in forma pauperis Form)(lad)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Hold Petitioner's 2254 in Abeyance and for Leave to Return to State Court to Exhaust Claims by Powell Jones, Jr. (lad) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Powell Jones, Jr.(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
