Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al
Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. |
Tsmc North America, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Tsmc Technology, Inc., NVIDIA Corporation and ASUSTeK Computer Inc. |
6:2019cv00494 |
August 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Answer Deadlines: NVIDIA Corporation answer due 1/9/2020; TSMC North America answer due 1/9/2020; TSMC Technology, Inc. answer due 1/9/2020. (bw) |
Case Stayed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1659(a) until the determination of theCommission in 337-TA-1177 becomes final. (bw) |
Text Order GRANTING #24 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Defendants TSMC North America, TSMC Technology, and NVIDIA Corporation's Motion. Noting that it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Defendants TSMC North America, TSMC Technology, and NVIDIA Corporation shall have up to and including January 9, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy) |
Text Order GRANTING #23 Motion to Stay Case entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Defendants Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, TSMC North America, TSMC Technology, NVIDIA Corporation, and ASUSTeK Computer's Motion. Because (1) the motion is unopposed, (2) the district court case and the ITC investigation involve the same parties and the same asserted patents, and (3) Defendants made a timely request (within thirty days after the ITC instituted its parallel investigation), the Court ORDERS that this case be stayed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1659(a) until the determination of the Commission in 337-TA-1177 becomes final. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy) |
Filing 24 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by NVIDIA Corporation, TSMC North America, TSMC Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harper, David) |
Filing 23 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Case by ASUSTeK Computer Inc., NVIDIA Corporation, TSMC North America, TSMC Technology, Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order)(Harper, David) |
Filing 22 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. as to ASUSTeK Computer Inc.. Waiver sent on 10/9/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 21 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. as to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. Waiver sent on 10/9/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. (Fair, Andrea) |
Reset Answer Deadlines due to International Defendant: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. answer due 1/9/2020; Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. answer due 1/9/2020. (bw) |
Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. served on 9/23/2019, answer due 10/14/2019. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. TSMC North America served on 9/23/2019, answer due 10/14/2019. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. TSMC Technology, Inc. served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. NVIDIA Corporation served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 16 Summons Issued as to TSMC Technology, Inc.. (bw) |
Filing 15 Summons Issued as to TSMC North America. (bw) |
Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. (bw) |
Filing 13 Summons Issued as to NVIDIA Corporation. (bw) |
Filing 12 Summons Issued as to ASUSTeK Computer Inc.. (bw) |
Filing 11 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 10 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 6 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 5 Report on Patent sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bw) |
Filing 4 Pro Hac Vice Letter re Michael 1. Renaud, James Wodarski, Michael J. McNamara, William Meunier, Samuel F. Davenport, Adam S. Rizk, Marguerite McConihe, Matthew A. Karambelas, Catherine Xu, Jessica L. Perry, Christopher G. Duerden, Nana Liu, and Kara E. Grogan. (bw) |
Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letter re Peter F Snell. (bw) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea L. Fair on behalf of Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. Attorney Andrea L. Fair added to party Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.(pty:pla) (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12522697), filed by Globalfoundries U.S. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ward, T.) |
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.