KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Acer America Corporation et al
KT Imaging USA, LLC |
Acer Inc. and Acer America Corporation |
6:2020cv00299 |
April 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Acer Inc. (lad) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Acer Inc. (lad) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Acer America Corporation. (lad) |
Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by KT Imaging USA, LLC. (Davis, Stafford) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by KT Imaging USA, LLC. (Davis, Stafford) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Davis, Stafford) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement (Original) ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13475906), filed by KT Imaging USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Attachment A, #10 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Stafford) |
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.