AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC v. CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC
| AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC |
| CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC |
| 6:2020cv00606 |
| July 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alan D Albright: Telephone Conference held on 8/28/2020. Case called for telephonic scheduling conference. There has been a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant. Defendants do not think that the venue is correct in this district. February 11, 2021 is suggested Markman Hearing date. Plaintiff can respond to dismissal motion w/in 14 days. The Court is going to stay the case until after the response is filed and the Court can make a ruling on the motion. The Court will have a hearing the week following the time the motion is ripe and then the Court will make a ruling. The Markman Hearing will go ahead and be calendared but no further work on the case needs to be done. If the Court denies the motion to dismiss then the Court will also make further rulings about the parties issues. (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (Court Reporter Lily Reznik.)(am) |
Filing 26
ORDER RESETTING TIME OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, Telephone Conference set for 8/28/2020 02:30 PM before Judge Alan D Albright. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (am)
|
| Filing 25 Unopposed Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: #1 Sealed Document Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, #2 Affidavit of Nathan S. Mammen, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Sealed Document Exhibit 3, #5 Sealed Document Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Proposed Order) (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 24 Sealed Document filed: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (unredacted) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Exhibit F) (lad) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #23 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Alan D Albright. The Motion is GRANTED, and the Clerk's Office is directed to file under seal Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and accompanying exhibits. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (as)
|
| Filing 23 Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order granting Motion to File under Seal First Amended Complaint, #2 Sealed Document First Amended Complaint, #3 Sealed Document B_NDA, #4 Sealed Document C_May 26 Correspondence, #5 Sealed Document D_June 12 Correspondence, #6 Sealed Document E_July 3 Correspondence, #7 Sealed Document F_July 9 & 13 Correspondence) (Llagostera, Domingo) |
| Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT , Redacted, against CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC amending #1 Complaint,., filed by AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A_996 Patent, #2 Exhibit B_NDA slipsheet, #3 Exhibit C_May 26 Correspondence - slipsheet, #4 Exhibit D_June 12 Correspondence - slipsheet, #5 Exhibit E_July 3 Correspondence - slipsheet, #6 Exhibit F_July 9 & 13 Correspondence - slipsheet, #7 Exhibit G_Claim Chart, #8 Exhibit H_Patent Publication)(Llagostera, Domingo) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER Governing Proceedings Patent Case. Telephonic Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 8/28/2020 01:30 PM before Judge Alan D Albright. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot2)
|
| Filing 20 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Andrew K. Fletcher. (lad) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Plaintiff's Motion. Noting that it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including August 25, 2020 to respond/reply. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)
|
| Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #17 Sealed Motion filed by AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Llagostera, Domingo) |
| Filing 18 REDACTED MOTION TO DISMISS to #17 Sealed Motion filed by CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 17 Sealed Motion filed: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Nathan S. Mammen, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #3 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #4 Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #5 Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #6 Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #7 Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen) (lad) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #15 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. The Court GRANTS the motion. The Clerk's Office is directed to file Defendant's Motion and exhibits thereto under seal.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)
|
| Filing 16 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 15 Unopposed Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Sealed Document DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED, #3 Affidavit of Nathan S. Mammen, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #5 Sealed Document Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #6 Sealed Document Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #7 Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #8 Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen, #9 Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Nathan S. Mammen) (Shelton, Barry) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Benjamin Behrendt ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13820435) by on behalf of CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Nathan Mammen ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13820432) by on behalf of CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Gregg LoCascio ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13820430) by on behalf of CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry K. Shelton on behalf of CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Attorney Barry K. Shelton added to party CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC(pty:dft) (Shelton, Barry) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Russell T. Wong on behalf of AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC. Attorney Russell T. Wong added to party AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC(pty:pla) (Wong, Russell) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file under seal. The Court GRANTS the Motion. The Clerk's Office is directed to file the Exhibits #1 and #2 attached hereto under seal. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)
|
| Filing 9 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC. (Llagostera, Domingo) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC. CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC served on 7/14/2020, answer due 8/4/2020. (Llagostera, Domingo) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (am) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC. to Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc., (Llagostera, Domingo) (Main Document 5 replaced on 7/8/2020) (am). |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Llagostera, Domingo) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to the Standing Order Regarding Patent/Trademark Cases effective 12/9/19, Attorneys filing Patent/Trademark cases in TXWD Waco division must prepare the attached form AO120 and e-file using the "Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form" event upon opening of the case. (Attachments: #1 AO-120) (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 2 Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: #1 Sealed Document Complaint [unredacted], #2 Sealed Document Exhibit B [sealed], #3 Proposed Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Seal) (Llagostera, Domingo) |
| Filing 1 Redacted COMPLAINT against Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc., ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13723498). No Summons requested at this time, filed by AKURATE DYNAMICS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A _996 Patent, #2 Exhibit B_Filed under Seal, #3 Exhibit C_Claim Chart, #4 Exhibit D_Patent Publication, #5 Civil Cover Sheet JS 44)(Llagostera, Domingo) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2020: #6 Unredacted Complaint, #7 Exhibit B - sealed) (lad). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
