Maxell, Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
| Maxell, Ltd. |
| Apple Inc. |
| 6:2020cv00646 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines: Apple Inc. answer due 9/24/2020. (lad) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Respond by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Guaragna, John) |
Text Order GRANTING #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Defendant has until up to and including September 24, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (as)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Defendant's Motion. Noting that it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Defendant shall have up to and including September 10, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Apple Inc. answer due 9/10/2020. (lad) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Guaragna, John) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maxell, Ltd.. Apple Inc. served on 7/21/2020, answer due 8/11/2020. (Harrell, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Apple Inc. (lad) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Maxell, Ltd.. (Harrell, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Harrell, Robert) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Maxell, Ltd.. (Harrell, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13768209), filed by Maxell, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harrell, Robert) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maxell, Ltd. v. Apple Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apple Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John Michael Guaragna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maxell, Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Robert S. Harrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
