Mitchell v. Saul
| Evon R Mitchell and Evon R. Mitchell |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 6:2020cv00720 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Jeffrey C Manske |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, Social Security Liaison, U.S. Attorney Liaison, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (lad) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Evon R. Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons, #3 summons)(Scoggin, Steven) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT, filed by Evon R. Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mc5) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (mc5)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. Referral Judge: Jeffrey C. Manske. (lad) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Evon R Mitchell. (Scoggin, Steven) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Evon R Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scoggin, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
