Richman Technology Corporation v. Google LLC
| Richman Technology Corporation |
| Google LLC |
| 6:2020cv00769 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness in Patent Cases |
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. BEFORE THE COURT is the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant Google LLC to Answer or Otherwise Respond (the Unopposed Motion). The Court has considered the Unopposed Motion and finds that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Google LLC to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint for Patent Infringement is extended untilNovember 2, 2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Google LLC answer due 11/2/2020. (bw) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Google LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Amstutz, Paige) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Google LLC. (lad) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Richman Technology Corporation. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Richman Technology Corporation. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Richman Technology Corporation (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13894534), filed by Richman Technology Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Richman Technology Corporation v. Google LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richman Technology Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Google LLC | |
| Represented By: | Paige Arnette Amstutz |
| Represented By: | Bijal V. Vakil |
| Represented By: | Shamita D. Etienne-Cummings |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
