Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
| Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC |
| CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
| 6:2020cv00851 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot1) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION For Extension of Time To Respond to Complaint by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sobaje, Justin) |
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall apply for admission to the bar of this court in compliance with Local Rule AT-1(f)(1). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall apply for admission to the bar of this court in compliance with Local Rule AT-1(f)(1). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sara Ann Brown on behalf of Justin Sobaje ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14004697) by on behalf of CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brown, Sara) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sara Ann Brown on behalf of Jeanne Gills ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14004652) by on behalf of CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brown, Sara) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sara Ann Brown on behalf of CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. Attorney Sara Ann Brown added to party CVS Pharmacy, Inc.(pty:dft) (Brown, Sara) |
| Filing 11 Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness in Patent Cases |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (am) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13978724), filed by Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Justin M. Sobaje |
| Represented By: | Sara Ann Brown |
| Represented By: | Jeanne M. Gills |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
