The California Institute of Technology v. HP Inc.
Plaintiff: The California Institute of Technology
Defendant: HP Inc.
Case Number: 6:2020cv01041
Filed: November 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2021 Filing 11 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by HP Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry)
January 7, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry K. Shelton on behalf of HP Inc.. Attorney Barry K. Shelton added to party HP Inc.(pty:dft) (Shelton, Barry)
January 4, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The California Institute of Technology. HP Inc. served on 12/22/2020, answer due 1/12/2021. (Mann, J.)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brian P. Biddinger for The California Institute of Technology. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney James R. Asperger for The California Institute of Technology. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
November 19, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by J. Mark Mann for James R. Asperger ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14202028) by on behalf of The California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mann, J.)
November 19, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by J. Mark Mann for Brian Biddinger ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14201994) by on behalf of The California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mann, J.)
November 17, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to HP Inc.. (bw)
November 17, 2020 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by The California Institute of Technology. (Mann, J.) (Main Document 5 replaced on 11/17/2020) (bw).
November 13, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mann, J.) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/13/2020) (am).
November 12, 2020 Filing 3 Pursuant to the Standing Order regarding Patent/Trademark Cases effective December 9,2019, attorneys filing Patent/Trademark cases in TXWD Waco Division must prepare the attached form AO-120 and e-file using the "Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form" event. (am)
November 12, 2020 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (am)
November 11, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-14172280). No Summons requested at this time, filed by The California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mann, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The California Institute of Technology v. HP Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HP Inc.
Represented By: Barry K. Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The California Institute of Technology
Represented By: J. Mark Mann
Represented By: Brian P. Biddinger
Represented By: G. Blake Thompson
Represented By: James R. Asperger
Represented By: Todd M. Briggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?