Cosentino Research and Development SLU et al v. Cambria Company LLC
Plaintiff: Cosentino SAU, Cosentino Research and Development SLU and C&C North America Inc.
Defendant: Cambria Company LLC
Case Number: 6:2020cv01080
Filed: November 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jennifer H. Roscetti for C&C North America Inc., Cosentino Research and Development SLU, and Cosentino SAU. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jeffrey C. Totten for C&C North America Inc., Cosentino Research and Development SLU, and Cosentino SAU. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
December 11, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer H. Roscetti ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14277335) by John P. Palmer on behalf of C&C North America Inc., Cosentino Research and Development SLU, Cosentino SAU. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Palmer, John)
December 4, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE by C&C North America Inc., Cosentino Research and Development SLU, Cosentino SAU (Palmer, John)
December 3, 2020 Reset Deadlines: Cambria Company LLC answer due 2/4/2021. (lad)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. On this day the Court considered Plaintiffs Cosentino Research and Development S.L.U., Cosentino S.A.U., and C & C North America, Inc. Unopposed Motion to Enter Proposed Order Regarding Service and Answer. Having fully considered the Motion, the Court hereby grants the Motion.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant has waived service of a Summons and the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). 2. A Summons and the Complaint are deemed served upon Defendant that have not otherwise been served previously as of the date of this Order below.3. Defendant shall have until and including February 4, 2021 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
December 2, 2020 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by C&C North America Inc., Cosentino Research and Development SLU, Cosentino SAU. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Palmer, John)
December 1, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John P. Palmer ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14234260) by on behalf of Cosentino Research and Development SLU, Cosentino SAU. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Palmer, John)
November 24, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Palmer, John) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/24/2020) (am).
November 24, 2020 Filing 3 Pursuant to the Standing Order regarding Patent/Trademark Cases effective December 9,2019, attorneys filing Patent/Trademark cases in TXWD Waco Division must prepare the attached form AO-120 and e-file using the "Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form". (am) (bw). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/24/2020: #1 AO120 FORM) (bw).
November 24, 2020 Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter to C&C North America Inc., Cosentino Research and Development SLU, Cosentino SAU. (am)
November 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-14218534). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Cosentino Research and Development SLU, Cosentino SAU. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement AO120 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Tradmark)(Palmer, John)
November 24, 2020 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cosentino Research and Development SLU et al v. Cambria Company LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cosentino SAU
Represented By: Jennifer Marie Roscetti
Represented By: John P. Palmer
Represented By: Jennifer H. Roscetti
Represented By: Jeffrey C. Totten
Represented By: Jacqueline P. Altman
Represented By: John A. Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cosentino Research and Development SLU
Represented By: Jennifer Marie Roscetti
Represented By: John P. Palmer
Represented By: Jennifer H. Roscetti
Represented By: Jeffrey C. Totten
Represented By: Jacqueline P. Altman
Represented By: John A. Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C&C North America Inc.
Represented By: Jennifer Marie Roscetti
Represented By: John P. Palmer
Represented By: Jennifer H. Roscetti
Represented By: Jeffrey C. Totten
Represented By: Jacqueline P. Altman
Represented By: John A. Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cambria Company LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?