Adams v. Absolute Consulting, Inc.
Natalie Adams |
Absolute Consulting, Inc. |
6:2020cv01099 |
December 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Jeffrey C Manske |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Adams' Sealed Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (am) |
Text Order GRANTING #16 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. It is therefore ORDERED that Exhibit 1 (found at exhibit 1 of the instant Motion) to Adams's Response to Absolute Consulting Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss shall be filed under seal and shall remain under seal where filed as exhibits to the Response. Further, all references to the Exhibit in the Response may be redacted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Exhibit 1 to the instant Motion UNDER SEAL as Exhibit 1 to Adams's Response (ECF No. 17). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kg) |
Filing 17 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Natalie Adams, re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Absolute Consulting, Inc. [Redacted] (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Josephson, Michael) |
Filing 16 Unopposed Motion for leave to File Sealed Document. Referral Judge: Jeffrey C. Manske. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order) (Josephson, Michael) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeremy William Hays on behalf of Stephanie K. Baron ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14393146) by on behalf of Absolute Consulting, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (Hays, Jeremy) (Main Document 15 replaced on 1/20/2021) (am). |
Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeremy William Hays on behalf of Suzanne W. Decker ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14393116) by on behalf of Absolute Consulting, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (Hays, Jeremy) |
Text Order GRANTING #15 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kg) |
Text Order GRANTING #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kg) |
Text Order GRANTING #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before January 20, 2021 and Defendant shall file its reply on or before February 3, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kg) |
Filing 13 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Natalie Adams. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (Liles, William) |
Filing 12 Sealed Document filed (mc5) |
Text Order GRANTING #11 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhg) |
Filing 11 Motion for leave to File Sealed Document. Referral Judge: Jeffrey C. Manske. (Attachments: #1 Sealed Document Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order) (Hays, Jeremy) |
Filing 10 APPENDIX to #9 Brief, #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Absolute Consulting, Inc.. (Hays, Jeremy) |
Filing 9 BRIEF regarding #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Absolute Consulting, Inc.. (Hays, Jeremy) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Absolute Consulting, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hays, Jeremy) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Consents by Natalie Adams (Josephson, Michael) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Natalie Adams. Absolute Consulting, Inc. served on 12/3/2020, answer due 12/24/2020. (Liles, William) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William R. Liles on behalf of Natalie Adams. Attorney William R. Liles added to party Natalie Adams(pty:pla) (Liles, William) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew W. Dunlap on behalf of Natalie Adams (Dunlap, Andrew) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Absolute Consulting, Inc. (lad) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Natalie Adams. (Josephson, Michael) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/2/2020) (lad). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14237640), filed by Natalie Adams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Josephson, Michael) (Attachment 2 replaced on 12/2/2020) (lad). |
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.