AML IP, LLC v. REBILLY, INC.
| AML IP, LLC |
| REBILLY, INC. |
| 6:2020cv01199 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Pleadings in Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. as of 2/12/2021. (bot1)
|
| Reset Deadlines: REBILLY, INC. answer due 3/1/2021. (am) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. The Court, having reviewed Defendants Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time and finding that the relief requested therein is appropriate and in the interests of justice, GRANTS Defendants motion and ORDERS that the current deadline for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended by 30 days up to and including March 1, 2021. SO ORDERED(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by REBILLY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, Gilbert) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AML IP, LLC. REBILLY, INC. served on 1/8/2021, answer due 1/29/2021. (Ramey, William) Dates corrected by Clerk's office on 1/8/2021 (lad). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to REBILLY, INC.. (bw) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by AML IP, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to the Standing Order Regarding Patent Trademark Cases effective 12/9/19, Attorneys filing Patent/Trademark cases in TXWD Waco division must prepare the attached form AO120 and e-file upon opening of the case. (Attachments: #1 AO-120 Form) (bw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14328832), filed by AML IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US6876979, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bw) |
|
Filing 2
Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness v2.1. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AML IP, LLC v. REBILLY, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AML IP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: REBILLY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Gilbert Andrew Greene |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
