Hitel Technologies LLC v. GAP, Inc.
| Hitel Technologies LLC |
| GAP, Inc. |
| 6:2020cv01205 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant Gap, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint For Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1) by GAP, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Michael J. Lyons, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I)(Hsu-Hoffman, Ahren) |
| Filing 12 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by GAP, Inc.. (Hsu-Hoffman, Ahren) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ahren C. Hsu-Hoffman on behalf of GAP, Inc.. Attorney Ahren C. Hsu-Hoffman added to party GAP, Inc.(pty:dft) (Hsu-Hoffman, Ahren) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Elizabeth M. Chiaviello filed on behalf of Michael J. Lyons ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14534824) by on behalf of GAP, Inc.. (Chiaviello, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth M. Chiaviello on behalf of GAP, Inc.. Attorney Elizabeth M. Chiaviello added to party GAP, Inc.(pty:dft) (Chiaviello, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8
Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Pleadings in Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. as of 2/12/2021. (bot1)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Hitel Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to GAP, Inc.. (bw) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bw) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Hitel Technologies LLC. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Hitel Technologies LLC. (Mort, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14331252), filed by Hitel Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mort, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hitel Technologies LLC v. GAP, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hitel Technologies LLC | |
| Represented By: | Raymond W Mort, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GAP, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth M. Chiaviello |
| Represented By: | Ahren C. Hsu-Hoffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
