Hitel Technologies LLC v. The Mens Wearhouse, LLC
Hitel Technologies LLC |
The Mens Wearhouse, LLC |
6:2020cv01209 |
December 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by The Mens Wearhouse, LLC. (Ravel, J.) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by The Mens Wearhouse, LLC.(Ravel, J.) |
Filing 9 Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Pleadings in Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. as of 2/12/2021. (bot1) |
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. This Court, after considering the foregoing Defendants Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiffs Complaint, is of the opinion that the Motion should be granted. IT IS ORDERED that The Mens Wearhouse, LLCs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiffs Complaint is GRANTED. Defendants deadline to file a response to Plaintiffs Complaint is extended through and including February 26, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4) |
Reset Deadlines: The Mens Wearhouse, LLC answer due 2/26/2021. (lad) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by The Mens Wearhouse, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravel, J.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by J. Stephen Ravel on behalf of The Mens Wearhouse, LLC. Attorney J. Stephen Ravel added to party The Mens Wearhouse, LLC(pty:dft) (Ravel, J.) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to The Mens Wearhouse, LLC. (bw) |
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bw) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Hitel Technologies LLC. (Mort, Raymond) |
Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mort, Raymond) |
Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Hitel Technologies LLC. (Mort, Raymond) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14331275), filed by Hitel Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mort, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hitel Technologies LLC v. The Mens Wearhouse, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Mens Wearhouse, LLC | |
Represented By: | J. Stephen Ravel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Hitel Technologies LLC | |
Represented By: | Raymond W Mort, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.