Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC v. Diversys Learning, Inc.
| Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC |
| DIVERSYS LEARNING, INC. |
| 6:2021cv00159 |
| February 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Diversys Learning, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greeson, Robert) |
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. On this date, the Court considered Defendant Diversys Learning, Inc.s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Having consdered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be, and is hereby, GRANTED. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendants time to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is extended up to and including Wednesday, April 21, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Diversys Learning, Inc. answer due 4/21/2021. (lad) |
| Filing 9 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Atty Greeson. (lad) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Diversys Learning, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greeson, Robert) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC. Diversys Learning, Inc. served on 3/1/2021, answer due 3/22/2021. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DIVERSYS LEARNING, INC.. (lad) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14503090), filed by Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US7299067, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC v. Diversys Learning, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DIVERSYS LEARNING, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas A. Nesbitt |
| Represented By: | Mark Thomas Garrett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
