VI Technologies, LLC v. Woolpert, Inc.
Plaintiff: VI Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Woolpert, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2021cv00318
Filed: March 31, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2021 Filing 15 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Woolpert, Inc.. (McNabnay, Neil)
May 24, 2021 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Woolpert, Inc..(McNabnay, Neil)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Paul J. Linden for Woolpert, Inc. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ir)
May 10, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Neil J. McNabnay as to Paul J. Linden ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14787273) by on behalf of Woolpert, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McNabnay, Neil)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Lucas V. Haugh for Woolpert, Inc. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney John F. Bennett for Woolpert, Inc. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
May 3, 2021 Reset Answer Deadlines: Woolpert, Inc. answer due 5/24/2021. (bw)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint be moved from April 22, 2021, to May 24, 2021 to allow Defendant sufficient time to finalize investigation of the allegations in the Complaint and respond to the allegations. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (re)
April 22, 2021 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Woolpert, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bonilla, Ricardo)
April 20, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Neil J. McNabnay as to John F. Bennett ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14719212) by on behalf of Woolpert, Inc.. (McNabnay, Neil)
April 19, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Neil J. McNabnay as to Lucas V. Haugh ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14713806) by on behalf of Woolpert, Inc.. (McNabnay, Neil)
April 19, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ricardo Joel Bonilla on behalf of Woolpert, Inc.. Attorney Ricardo Joel Bonilla added to party Woolpert, Inc.(pty:dft) (Bonilla, Ricardo)
April 19, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarika Patel on behalf of Woolpert, Inc.. Attorney Sarika Patel added to party Woolpert, Inc.(pty:dft) (Patel, Sarika)
April 19, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Neil J. McNabnay on behalf of Woolpert, Inc.. Attorney Neil J. McNabnay added to party Woolpert, Inc.(pty:dft) (McNabnay, Neil)
March 31, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Woolpert, Inc.. (lad)
March 31, 2021 Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Atty Rozier. (lad)
March 31, 2021 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by VI Technologies, LLC. (Williams, Fred)
March 31, 2021 Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by VI Technologies, LLC. (Williams, Fred)
March 31, 2021 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Williams, Fred)
March 31, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14649702), filed by VI Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams, Fred)
March 31, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad)
March 31, 2021 All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders of Judge Alan D. Albright located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VI Technologies, LLC v. Woolpert, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Woolpert, Inc.
Represented By: Paul J. Linden
Represented By: Lucas V. Haugh
Represented By: John F. Bennett
Represented By: Ricardo Joel Bonilla
Represented By: Neil J. McNabnay
Represented By: Sarika Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VI Technologies, LLC
Represented By: John Wittenzellner
Represented By: Jonathan L. Hardt
Represented By: Michael Simons
Represented By: Todd E. Landis
Represented By: Fred I. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?