Identity Security LLC v. Apple, Inc.
| Identity Security LLC |
| Apple, Inc. |
| 6:2021cv00460 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines: Apple, Inc. answer due 7/9/2021. (lad) |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Apple, Inc., re #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Defendant Apple, Inc. (Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by J. Stephen Ravel on behalf of Apple, Inc. (Ravel, J.) |
Text Order GRANTING #11 , #12 , and #13 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court are the Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motions, finds they should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicants, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright.; GRANTING #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. This Court, after considering Defendant Apple Inc.s Opposed Motion for 14-Day Extension (Motion), is of the opinion that the Motion and 14-day extension requested therein should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Apple Inc.s Motion is GRANTED, and Defendants deadline to file a response to Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby extended through and including July 9, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Identity Security LLC, re #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Defendant Apple, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - May 2021 email, #2 Exhibit 2 - June 22 email, #3 Proposed Order)(Lahad, John) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by J. Stephen Ravel on behalf of Leslie M. Spencer ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14944656) by on behalf of Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by J. Stephen Ravel on behalf of Cosmin Maier ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14944635) by on behalf of Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by J. Stephen Ravel on behalf of John M. Desmarais ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14944620) by on behalf of Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravel, J.) |
|
Filing 10
Standing Order regarding Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Apple, Inc. answer due 6/25/2021. (mc5) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. This Court, after considering Defendant Apple, Inc.s Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Plaintiffs Original Complaint for Patent Infringement and Jury Demand (Unopposed Motion), is of the opinion that the Motion should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Apple, Inc.s Unopposed Motion is GRANTED, and Defendants deadline to file a response to Plaintiffs Original Complaint forPatent Infringement and Jury Demand is hereby extended through and including June 25, 2021 (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by J. Stephen Ravel on behalf of Apple, Inc.. Attorney J. Stephen Ravel added to party Apple, Inc.(pty:dft) (Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 7 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Identity Security LLC. (Lahad, John) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Identity Security LLC. Apple, Inc. served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021. (Lahad, John) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Apple, Inc.. (lad) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Lahad, John) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Matt Wood. (lad) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Identity Security LLC. (Lahad, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Plaintiff's Original Complaint for Patent Infringement and Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14764172), filed by Identity Security LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lahad, John) |
| All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders of Judge Alan D. Albright located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
