Smith v. Lumpkin - TDCJ Director
Roy Dean Smith |
Kathryn J. Jody Gilliam |
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID |
6:2021cv00486 |
May 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Certificate of Appealability is Denied. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (ab4) |
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tb) |
Text Order DISMISSING #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Alan D Albright. The Court has already granted Petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tb) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roy Dean Smith. (lad) |
Filing 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Roy Dean Smith.(lad) |
Filing 4 ORDER converting case and #1 Complaint to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus/2254. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter. (lad) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roy Dean Smith. (lad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Roy Dean Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.