DATREC, LLC v. PINGBOARD, INC.
Plaintiff: DATREC, LLC
Defendant: PINGBOARD, INC.
Case Number: 6:2021cv00568
Filed: June 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2022 Filing 21 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot2)
February 28, 2022 Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal by DATREC, LLC. (Ramey, William)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER CANCELLING Discovery Hearing. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER, (Discovery Hearing set for 2/23/2022 09:30 AM before Judge Alan D Albright). Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 7/14/2022. Markman Hearing set for 6/2/2022 09:00 AM before Judge Alan D Albright. Amended Pleadings due by 9/22/2022. Motions due by 3/9/2023. Pretrial Conference set for 5/11/2023 before Judge Alan D Albright. Jury Selection set for 6/1/2023 before Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. Jury Trial set for 6/1/2023 09:00 AM before Judge Alan D Albright. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jc5)
December 17, 2021 Filing 16 Proposed Scheduling Order Corrected by DATREC, LLC. (Ramey, William) Modified on 12/20/2021 to change to Motion for entry of scheduling order Pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Proceedings(ir).
December 16, 2021 Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by DATREC, LLC. (Ramey, William)
October 22, 2021 Filing 14 STATUS REPORT Amended Case Readiness by DATREC, LLC. (Ramey, William)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Standing Order Regarding Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
September 3, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to #9 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by DATREC, LLC.(Ramey, William)
August 27, 2021 Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by DATREC, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Ramey, William)
August 23, 2021 Filing 10 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by PINGBOARD, INC.. (Pogorzelski, Henry)
August 14, 2021 Reset Deadlines: PINGBOARD, INC. answer due 8/13/2021. (ls)
August 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. It is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Pingboard, Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is hereby extended up and until August 13, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (re)
August 13, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against DATREC, LLC by PINGBOARD, INC..(Pogorzelski, Henry)
July 28, 2021 Filing 8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by PINGBOARD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pogorzelski, Henry)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. It is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Pingboard, Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is hereby extended up and until July 29,2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (re)
July 20, 2021 Reset Deadlines: PINGBOARD, INC. answer due 7/29/2021. (bw)
June 28, 2021 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by PINGBOARD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pogorzelski, Henry)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Standing Order regarding Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
June 9, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DATREC, LLC. PINGBOARD, INC. served on 6/8/2021, answer due 6/29/2021. (Ramey, William)
June 7, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PINGBOARD, INC.. (lad)
June 7, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad)
June 7, 2021 All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad)
June 4, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by DATREC, LLC. (Ramey, William)
June 4, 2021 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William)
June 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14878131), filed by DATREC, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US8381309, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DATREC, LLC v. PINGBOARD, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DATREC, LLC
Represented By: William P. Ramey, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PINGBOARD, INC.
Represented By: Henry Pogorzelski
Represented By: Stewart Mesher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?