Nixon v. Marlin I.S.D.
Ms. Lori A. Nixon and Lori A. Nixon |
Marlin I.S.D. |
6:2021cv00736 |
July 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Alan D Albright |
Jeffrey C Manske |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 DOCKET CONTROL ORDER PURSUANT TO RULES 16(b) AND 26(f). Signed by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (ir) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint . Attorney Bridget Robinson added to party Marlin I.S.D.(pty:dft) by Marlin I.S.D..(Robinson, Bridget) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Clark B. Will [for Nicholas Alban O'Kelly] ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15101786) by on behalf of Lori A. Nixon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Pro Hac Vice). Motions referred to Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (Will, Clark) |
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Nicholas A. O'Kelly for Lori A. Nixon. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jc5) |
Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Nicholas A. OKelly. Summons requested with amended complaint will not be issued until the requesting/signing atty has been granted Pro Hac admission. (lad) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Marlin I.S.D. (jc5) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Marlin I.S.D. (jc5) Modified on 8/12/2021 to show System error - duplicated (bw). |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Lori A. Nixon. (Will, Clark) Documents withheld from quality control and issuance because filing atty is not admitted/has been advised to file for Pro Hac appearance (lad). |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Marlin I.S.D. amending, filed by Lori A. Nixon.(Will, Clark) Documents withheld from quality control because filing atty is not admitted/has been advised to file for Pro Hac appearance (lad). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Marlin I.S.D.. (lad) |
Filing 4 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Nicholas O'Kelly. (lad) |
All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad) |
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE (lad) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Lori A. Nixon. (Will, Clark) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Lori A. Nixon. (Will, Clark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT [Original Complaint] ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15023431), filed by Lori A. Nixon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Will, Clark) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/19/2021) (lad). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.