Motion Offense, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.
| Motion Offense, LLC |
| Dropbox, Inc. |
| 6:2021cv00758 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING #15 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Mariam Clayton. Attorney added for Motion Offense, LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jkda)
|
| Document #15 was not flattened. Please notice that all documents are required to be flattened upon filing. The US Clerk's Office will flatten any document needed prior but all parties MUST flatten documents going forward. Contact the Clerk's Office for any questions. (jc5) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy Devlin on behalf of Mariam Clayton ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15229553) by on behalf of Motion Offense, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) (Main Document 15 replaced on 9/16/2021 - due to document submitted without flattening.) (jc5). |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Dropbox, Inc., re #9 Opposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Defendant Dropbox, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Gregory Lantier, #2 Exhibit 3, #3 Exhibit 4)(Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 13 STATUS REPORT - Case Readiness Status Report by Motion Offense, LLC. (Dahlgren, Derek) |
| Filing 12 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Motion Offense, LLC, re #9 Opposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Defendant Dropbox, Inc. (Dahlgren, Derek) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Dropbox, Inc..(Ravel, J.) |
| Reset Deadlines: Dropbox, Inc. answer due 9/3/2021. (jc5) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Request to Change the deadline for Motion Offense, LLC to respond to Dropbox, Inc.'s Motion for Consolidation to September 3, 2021 by Motion Offense, LLC re #9 Opposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 Opposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Dropbox, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Gregory Lantier, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Proposed Order)(Ravel, J.) |
| Reset Deadlines: Dropbox, Inc. answer due 9/1/2021. (ls) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED, and Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended through and including September 1, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (re)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint for Patent Infringement by Dropbox, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by J. Stephen Ravel on behalf of Dropbox, Inc.. Attorney J. Stephen Ravel added to party Dropbox, Inc.(pty:dft) (Ravel, J.) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Motion Offense, LLC. Dropbox, Inc. served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Dropbox, Inc.. (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Motion Offense, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Motion Offense, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15047152), filed by Motion Offense, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Devlin, Timothy) |
| All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Motion Offense, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Motion Offense, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Devlin |
| Represented By: | Derek F. Dahlgren |
| Represented By: | Mariam Clayton |
| Represented By: | Alex Chan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dropbox, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | J. Stephen Ravel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
