Diatek Licensing LLC v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC
| Diatek Licensing LLC |
| Redbox Automated Retail, LLC |
| 6:2021cv00778 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines: Redbox Automated Retail, LLC answer due 10/8/2021. (ir) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer to Otherwise Respond by Redbox Automated Retail, LLC re #1 Complaint, (Al-Salam, Ramsey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ramsey M. Al-Salam on behalf of Redbox Automated Retail, LLC. Attorney Ramsey M. Al-Salam added to party Redbox Automated Retail, LLC(pty:dft) (Al-Salam, Ramsey) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jose Carlos Villarreal on behalf of Redbox Automated Retail, LLC. Attorney Jose Carlos Villarreal added to party Redbox Automated Retail, LLC(pty:dft) (Villarreal, Jose) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diatek Licensing LLC. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC served on 8/3/2021, answer due 8/24/2021. (Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Redbox Automated Retail, LLC. (lad) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Diatek Licensing LLC. (Alexander, Cortney) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Alexander, Cortney) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/29/2021) (lad). |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Diatek Licensing LLC. (Alexander, Cortney) (Main Document 2 replaced on 7/29/2021) (lad). (Main Document 2 replaced on 7/29/2021) (lad). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15063627), filed by Diatek Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 7,079,752, #2 Exhibit B - US Patent No. 8,195,828, #3 Exhibit C - Claim Chart for the '752 Patent, #4 Exhibit D - Claim Chart for the '828 Patent, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alexander, Cortney) (Attachment 5 replaced on 7/29/2021) (lad). |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
| All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diatek Licensing LLC v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diatek Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Cortney S. Alexander |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Redbox Automated Retail, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jose Carlos Villarreal |
| Represented By: | Ramsey M. Al-Salam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
