Lynch, et al v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
Plaintiff: Alfred Lynch and Sandra Lynch
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2021cv00795
Filed: August 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Referring Judge: Jeffrey C Manske
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2021 Filing 9 STIPULATION Joint by Starbucks Corporation. (Corley, Gayla)
September 3, 2021 Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Parties by Alfred Lynch, Sandra Lynch. (Rapp, David)
September 3, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Lynch, Alfred Lynch. Pactiv Packaging, Inc. served on 8/27/2021, answer due 9/17/2021. (Rapp, David)
September 3, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Lynch, Alfred Lynch. Starbucks Corporation served on 8/27/2021, answer due 9/17/2021. (Rapp, David)
August 3, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Pactiv Packaging, Inc.. (jc5)
August 3, 2021 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Alfred Lynch, Sandra Lynch. Pactiv Packaging Inc. (Rapp, David) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/3/2021) (jc5).
August 2, 2021 All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/
August 2, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Starbucks Corporation. (jc5)
August 2, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bw)
August 2, 2021 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (bw)
August 2, 2021 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Alfred Lynch, Sandra Lynch. Starbucks and Pactiv Packaging (Rapp, David)
August 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15074182). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Sandra Lynch, Alfred Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rapp, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lynch, et al v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alfred Lynch
Represented By: David D. Rapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Lynch
Represented By: David D. Rapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Gayla S. Corley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?