Atlas Global Technologies LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
Plaintiff: Atlas Global Technologies LLC
Defendant: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
Case Number: 6:2021cv00820
Filed: August 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2022 Filing 30 ATTACHMENT Corrected Proposed Order to #28 MOTION for Service of Process by Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Salinas, Alejandra)
January 20, 2022 Filing 29 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #28 MOTION for Service of Process. Pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Proceedings Dated 10/8/2021. The proposed Order shall omit the word Proposed from the title. Resubmit the Proposed Order using the Attachment event and link back to Motion. (ir)
January 20, 2022 Filing 28 MOTION for Service of Process by Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Salinas, Alejandra)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING #25 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. 2 certified originals sent to requesting atty via USPS CM#70081830000460366778. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/10/2021: #1 CM receipt) (lad). Originals exemplified x2 and returned via FedEx 791210679239 on 12/13/2021 (lad).
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Withdrawing Text Order on Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order ***WITHDRAWN PER #26 *** Text Order DENYING #25 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. This method of foreign service is improper. Plaintiff is directed to contact the Clerk's office for information on the proper methods of foreign service. Entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (WMlc) Modified on 10/28/2021 (lad).
October 27, 2021 Filing 25 MOTION for Issuance of Letter Rogatory by Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Letter Rogatory)(Salinas, Alejandra)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Standing Order Regarding Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
October 4, 2021 Filing 23 Summons Issued as to ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (ir)
October 4, 2021 Filing 22 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Tribble, Max)
September 28, 2021 Filing 21 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ASUSTeK Computer Inc. amending, filed by Atlas Global Technologies LLC.(Tribble, Max)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER DENYING #19 PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (ir)
September 8, 2021 Filing 19 MOTION for Alternative Service by Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fair, Andrea)
September 8, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by T. John Ward, Jr on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC. Attorney T. John Ward, Jr added to party Atlas Global Technologies LLC(pty:pla) (Ward, T.)
September 8, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea L. Fair on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC. Attorney Andrea L. Fair added to party Atlas Global Technologies LLC(pty:pla) (Fair, Andrea)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Oleg Elkhunovich for Atlas Global Technologies LLC. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jc5)
August 18, 2021 Filing 16 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joseph S. Grinstein for Oleg Elkhunovich ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15131834) by on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Grinstein, Joseph)
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney William B. Collier, Jr for Atlas Global Technologies LLC. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jc5)
August 12, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alejandra C. Salinas on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC (Salinas, Alejandra)
August 12, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kalpana Srinivasan on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC (Srinivasan, Kalpana)
August 12, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Max L. Tribble, Jr on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC (Tribble, Max)
August 12, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph S. Grinstein on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC (Grinstein, Joseph)
August 12, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Blaine A. Larson ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15111115) by on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Larson, Blaine)
August 11, 2021 Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Parties by Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Larson, Blaine)
August 11, 2021 Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Larson, Blaine)
August 10, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L. DeRieux on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC. Attorney Elizabeth L. DeRieux added to party Atlas Global Technologies LLC(pty:pla) (DeRieux, Elizabeth)
August 10, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by S. Calvin Capshaw, III on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC. Attorney S. Calvin Capshaw, III added to party Atlas Global Technologies LLC(pty:pla) (Capshaw, S.)
August 9, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Blaine A. Larson on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC (Larson, Blaine)
August 9, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alden G. Harris on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC (Harris, Alden)
August 9, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric James Enger on behalf of Atlas Global Technologies LLC (Enger, Eric)
August 9, 2021 Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letter. (Main document: Letter to Oleg Elkhunovich, Attachments: #1 Letter to William B. Collier, Jr.)(lad)
August 9, 2021 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Heim, Michael)
August 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15096686). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Atlas Global Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H)(Heim, Michael)
August 9, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad)
August 9, 2021 All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atlas Global Technologies LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atlas Global Technologies LLC
Represented By: Alden G. Harris
Represented By: Alejandra C. Salinas
Represented By: Blaine A. Larson
Represented By: Eric James Enger
Represented By: Joseph S. Grinstein
Represented By: Kalpana Srinivasan
Represented By: Max L. Tribble, Jr.
Represented By: Michael F. Heim
Represented By: Andrea L. Fair
Represented By: Elizabeth L. DeRieux
Represented By: Oleg Elkhunovich
Represented By: S. Calvin Capshaw, III
Represented By: T. John Ward, Jr.
Represented By: William Brown Collier, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?