Lytle v. Watson
Petitioner: Aaron Lytle, Sr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Sheriff Rodney B. Watson
Case Number: 6:2021cv00967
Filed: September 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2021 Filing 14 FINAL JUDGMENT. Petitioner Aaron Lytle Sr.s Petition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaustavailable state court remedies. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jc5)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jc5)
October 15, 2021 Filing 12 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Aaron Lytle, Sr. (lad)
October 14, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aaron Lytle, Sr. (lad)
October 7, 2021 Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to #9 Response to Order to Show Cause by Aaron Lytle, Sr. (lad)
October 7, 2021 Filing 9 RESPONSE to #4 Order to Show Cause by Aaron Lytle, Sr. (lad)
October 6, 2021 Filing 8 Courtesy copy of document filed in State Court: MOTION to Set Aside State Court Indictment by Aaron Lytle, Sr. (lad) Modified on 10/8/2021 (lad).
September 27, 2021 Filing 7 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Aaron Lytle, Sr. (lad)
September 27, 2021 Filing 6 Duplicate of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Aaron Little, Sr. (lad)
September 21, 2021 Show Cause Response due by 10/22/2021 (per Order #4 ) (lad)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DEFICIENCY ORDER. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form)(jc5)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to show cause- Petitioner shall show cause on or before October 22, 2021 why his complaint should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. Petitioner is warned that failure to respond to this Courts order may result in his case being dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jc5) Modified on 10/8/2021 (lad).
September 21, 2021 Filing 3 Amended Case Opening Letter. (lad)
September 20, 2021 Filing 2 Case Opening Letter. (lad)
September 17, 2021 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Aaron Lytle, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lytle v. Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Aaron Lytle, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sheriff Rodney B. Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?