Grohoske v. Lopez et al
| David Lester Grohoske |
| Sheriff Joe Lopez, D.A. Jody Gilliam, Deputy FNU Barry, Deputy FNU Hoy and Judge Bryan Russ, Jr. |
| 6:2021cv00982 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and his complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the three-dismissal rule of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiffs complaint may be reinstated only if the full filing fee of $402 is paid simultaneously with the filing of a motion to reinstate within thirty days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (ir)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Lester Grohoske. (lad) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT, filed by David Lester Grohoske.(lad) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by David Lester Grohoske. (lad) |
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by David Lester Grohoske. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Form, #2 IFP)(ir)
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter. (lad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by David Lester Grohoske. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
