Willhite v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
| Sheri Willhite |
| Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 6:2021cv01103 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioners Motion to Withdraw All Documents #7 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Petitioners Motion to Amend Complaint and Request Time Extension #8 is GRANTED. Petitioner has until January 7, 2022, either to respond to the Courts November 12, 2021 order or to file a Notice to Withdraw. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (Attachments: #1 2254, #2 IFP) (ir)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Amend Complaint, MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend pursuant to #3 Order, by Sheri Willhite. (Attachments: #1 Amended Petition and Nunc Pro Tunc)(lad) (Main Document 8 replaced on 12/6/2021) (lad). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw all documents filed into case by Sheri Willhite. (lad) |
| Filing 6 Advisory to the Court by Sheri Willhite. (ir) Modified on 11/30/2021 (ir). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE #4 . It is therefore ORDERED that, on or before December 13, 2021, Petitioner shall return to the Court a completed application for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 if she seeks to challenge her state-court convictions. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (Attachments: #1 2254 Form, #2 IFP)(ir)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #2 Case Opening Letter by Sheri Willhite. (lad) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Sheri Willhite. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. It is further ORDERED that, on or before December 1, 2021, Petitioner shall:(1) withdraw her present application for habeas corpus relief by filing a Notice ofWithdrawal; (2) file a Notice of Consent, stating that she wishes to proceed with herinstant submission, construed as a an application for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254; or (3) amend her instant filing so that it contains all the 2254claims she believes she has. Failure to take one of the three actions outlined above within the time specified by the Court will result in the dismissal, without prejudice, of Petitioners petition for habeas corpus relief without further notice. (Attachments: #1 2254, #2 IFP)(ir)
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter. (lad) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Sheri Willhite. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Willhite v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Sheri Willhite | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
