Randolph v. Bell County Sheriff
| Anthony Samax Randolph |
| Bell County Sheriff and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 6:2021cv01151 |
| November 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Anthony Samax Randolph. (lad) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/12/2021: #1 Medical records) (lad). |
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Anthony Sannax Randolph. Petitioner should return the completed form to the Court on or before December 10, 2021. Again, failure to exhaust state court remedies prior to bringing claims in federal court will result in dismissal of Randolphs federal petition. Petitioner is further warned that failure to respond to this Courts order may result in his case being dismissed for want of prosecution or for failure to obey an order of the Court. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (Attachments: #1 IFP)(ir) (Additional attachment added on 11/12/2021: #2 2241 Form, Modified to reflect the order. I mailed order, IFP and 2241 again on 11/12/2021) (ir).
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter. (lad) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Anthony Sannax Randolph. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
