Pedersen v. Microsoft Corporation
| Peter Pedersen |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| 6:2021cv01154 |
| November 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE UNOPPOSED FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RSPD MTD by Peter Pedersen (Ramey, William) |
| Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders and # COVID-19 standing order available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness for Patent Cases 030722,2. #Standing Order on Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases 030722,3. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings 4.0 - Patent Cases 030722,4. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Proceedings,5. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Joint Or Unopposed Request To Change Deadlines 030722,6. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Public Versions 030722. (jkda) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Unopposed Extension to Respond by Peter Pedersen re #15 Second MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS OF INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT AND TO STRIKE REQUESTS FOR ENHANCED DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 15 Second MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS OF INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT AND TO STRIKE REQUESTS FOR ENHANCED DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Microsoft Corporation amending, filed by Peter Pedersen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Ramey, William) |
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Christina J. McCullough. Attorney added for Microsoft Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jzda)
|
| Filing 12 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Microsoft Corporation for attorney Reese Nguyen. (zv) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Melissa Richards Smith for C. McCullough ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15625194) by on behalf of Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Theresa H. Nguyen on behalf of Microsoft Corporation. Attorney Theresa H. Nguyen added to party Microsoft Corporation(pty:dft) (Nguyen, Theresa) |
| Filing 9 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS OF INDIRECT AND WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT AND TO STRIKE REQUESTS FOR ENHANCED DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Melissa Richards Smith on behalf of Microsoft Corporation. Attorney Melissa Richards Smith added to party Microsoft Corporation(pty:dft) (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE UNOPPOSED FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER by Peter Pedersen (Ramey, William) |
| Reset Deadlines: Microsoft Corporation answer due 1/16/2022. (ir) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peter Pedersen. Microsoft Corporation served on 11/11/2021, answer due 12/2/2021. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Microsoft Corporation. (lad) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Peter Pedersen. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15424984), filed by Peter Pedersen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
| All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pedersen v. Microsoft Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peter Pedersen | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Microsoft Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Christina J. McCullough |
| Represented By: | Melissa Richards Smith |
| Represented By: | Theresa H. Nguyen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
