Huang v. Intel Corporation
| Xiaohua Huang and Paul Huang |
| Intel Corporation |
| 6:2021cv01213 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot1) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Xiaohua Huang re #1 Complaint (Huang, Xiaohua) |
| Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders and # COVID-19 standing order available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness for Patent Cases 030722,2. #Standing Order on Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases 030722,3. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings 4.0 - Patent Cases 030722,4. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Proceedings,5. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Joint Or Unopposed Request To Change Deadlines 030722,6. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Public Versions 030722. (jkda) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Before the Court is Defendant Intel Corporations (Intel) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and ishereby GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the deadline for Intel to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is April 18, 2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (JGlc)
|
|
Text Order MOOTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (JGlc)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Intel Corporation answer due 4/18/2022. (zv) |
| Filing 11 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Intel Corporation. (Nash, Brian) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order)(Nash, Brian) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Xiaohua Huang #7 Summons Issued, SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xiaohua Huang. Intel Corporation served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (Huang, Xiaohua) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #5 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically. E-Filing and E-Noticing Registration Form was attached for via USPS with ORDER. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (zv)
|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Request mailing). 2 copies sent to Plf via USPS.(lad) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee received in the amount of $402, receipt number 600028390. (zv) |
| Filing 5 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Xiaohua Huang. (lad) |
| Filing 4 Report on Patent sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office via USPS with copy of complaint. (lad) |
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter. (lad) |
| All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Xiaohua Huang. (lad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Xiaohua Huang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons request - blank)(lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
