EMBER IP, LLC v. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.
| EMBER IP, LLC |
| MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. |
| 6:2021cv01237 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bot1) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by EMBER IP, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Reset Deadlines: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. answer due 2/21/2022. (jc5) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Agreed Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. re #1 Complaint (Fareed, Syed) |
| Reset Deadlines: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. answer due 2/7/2022. (jc5) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Agreed Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. re #1 Complaint (Fareed, Syed) |
| Filing 8 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #7 Notice of Appearance. Pursuant to STANDING ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS PATENT CASES dated 10/8/2021, a motion is not required for extension of time to respond to the complaint. This must be done in form of a Notice. (ir) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Syed K. Fareed on behalf of MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.. Attorney Syed K. Fareed added to party MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.(pty:dft) (Fareed, Syed) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.. (Fareed, Syed) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by EMBER IP, LLC. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. served on 12/2/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.. (lad) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by EMBER IP, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15484199), filed by EMBER IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US7142826, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
| All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: EMBER IP, LLC v. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EMBER IP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. | |
| Represented By: | Syed K. Fareed |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
