Aprese Systems Texas, LLC v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. et al
| Aprese Systems Texas, LLC |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Nissan North America, Inc. and Central Austin Motorcars, LLC doing business as South Austin Nissan |
| 6:2021cv01299 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Aprese Systems Texas, LLC, re #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant Central Austin Motorcars, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Connor, Cabrach) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION of Extension of Time to Respond by Nissan North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nelson, Mark) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Aprese Systems Texas, LLC as to Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.. Waiver sent on 1/12/2022, answer due 4/12/2022. (Connor, Cabrach) |
| Reset Deadlines: Nissan North America, Inc. answer due 4/12/2022. (ir) |
| Filing 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Central Austin Motorcars, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Waites, C.) |
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Todd G. Vare. Attorney added for Nissan North America, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jzda)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mark C. Nelson for Todd G. Vare ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15622978) by on behalf of Nissan North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nelson, Mark) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE Unopposed Notice for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond by Nissan North America, Inc. re #1 Complaint (Nelson, Mark) |
| Reset Deadlines: Nissan North America, Inc. answer due 2/7/2022. (ir) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aprese Systems Texas, LLC. Nissan North America, Inc. served on 12/17/2021, answer due 1/7/2022. (Connor, Cabrach) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Nissan North America, Inc. (zv) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Central Austin Motorcars, LLC. (zv) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Aprese Systems Texas, LLC. (Connor, Cabrach) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Aprese Systems Texas, LLC. (Connor, Cabrach) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Aprese Systems Texas, LLC. (Connor, Cabrach) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Connor, Cabrach) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15537059). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Aprese Systems Texas, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Connor, Cabrach) |
| All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
