Johnson-Oleksiak v. Plains ER Management Harco, Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak
Defendant: Plains ER Management Harco, Ltd., Daniel Akers, Chloe Russell, Plains ER Management Temple, Ltd., Paula Chandler and Erica Lopez
Case Number: 6:2022cv00235
Filed: March 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Referring Judge: Derek T Gilliland
2 Judge: Jeffrey C Manske
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2022 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Daniel Akers, Paula Chandler, Erica Lopez, Plains ER Management Harco, Ltd., Plains ER Management Temple, Ltd., Chloe Russell. (Attachments: #1 USM forms)(lad)
April 11, 2022 Filing 9 Summons, USM forms and additional IFP form received.(lad)
April 11, 2022 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak. (lad)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. Case No Longer Referred To Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (jkda)
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. The Court GRANTS in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff is advised that the granting of in forma pauperis status does not prohibit a later determination that the action should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), because the allegation of poverty is untrue or the action is frivolous or malicious. Plaintiff is further advised that, although leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted, the Court may, in its discretion, impose costs of court at the conclusion of this lawsuit, as in other cases. It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this Order upon each person required to be served under Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as directed by the Plaintiff. The Clerk's Office is directed to provide the Plaintiff with the appropriate number of summonses and marshal forms. Plaintiff is directed to complete and return the summonses and marshal forms provided by the Clerk's Office, along with a copy of the complaint for each person required to be served. Plaintiff is admonished that she must act in a timely manner and that failure to perfect service on the Defendant within the time provided in Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall result in dismissal of this action. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (eglc)
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #5 Motion for Protective Order entered by Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. Defendants have not yet been served in this case. Therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's request without prejudice to refiling after Defendants have been served and have appeared in this case. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (eglc)
March 16, 2022 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak. Amended relief and signature pages. (Attachments: #1 Amended Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Additional exhibits)(lad)
March 10, 2022 Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders and # COVID-19 standing order available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness for Patent Cases 030722,2. #Standing Order on Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases 030722,3. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings 4.0 - Patent Cases 030722,4. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Proceedings,5. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Joint Or Unopposed Request To Change Deadlines 030722,6. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Public Versions 030722. (jkda)
March 3, 2022 Filing 6 Case Opening Letter by Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak. Distributed via Hand Delivery. (jc5) Modified on 3/3/2022 (jc5).
March 3, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Protective Order by Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak. Motions referred to Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (jc5)
March 3, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons). Motions referred to Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (jc5)
March 3, 2022 Filing 3 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak. (jc5)
March 3, 2022 Filing 2 EXHIBITS by Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K 1, #12 Exhibit K 2, #13 Exhibit K 3, #14 Exhibit L 1, #15 Exhibit L 2, #16 Exhibit L 3, #17 Exhibit M 1, #18 Exhibit M 2, #19 Exhibit M 3, #20 Exhibit N 1, #21 Exhibit N 2, #22 Exhibit N 3, #23 Exhibit O, #24 Exhibit P, #25 Exhibit Q, #26 Exhibit R, #27 Exhibit S, #28 Exhibit T, (NO EXHIBIT "U" submitted by filer) #29 Exhibit V, #30 Exhibit W, #31 Exhibit X)(jc5)
March 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak. (jc5)
March 3, 2022 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. (jc5)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson-Oleksiak v. Plains ER Management Harco, Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle S Johnson-Oleksiak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plains ER Management Harco, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Akers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chloe Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plains ER Management Temple, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paula Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erica Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?