Webroot, Inc. et al v. AO Kaspersky Lab
| Webroot, Inc. and Open Text, Inc. |
| AO Kaspersky Lab |
| 6:2022cv00243 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Derek T Gilliland |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Open Text Corporation for Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc.. (Mills, Jeffrey) |
Filing 14
Standing Order Regarding Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (zv)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Withdrawal by Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc. re #9 MOTION for an Order Authorizing Alternative Service (Mills, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark D. Siegmund on behalf of Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc.. Attorney Mark D. Siegmund added to party Open Text, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Mark D. Siegmund added to party Webroot, Inc.(pty:pla) (Siegmund, Mark) |
| Filing 10 ATTACHMENT Order to #9 MOTION for an Order Authorizing Alternative Service by Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc.. (Mills, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 *Withdrawn per Notice on 03/30/2022.* MOTION for an Order Authorizing Alternative Service by Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeffery Mills, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Proposed Order)(Mills, Jeffrey) Modified on 3/30/2022 (zv). |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #9 MOTION for an Order Authorizing Alternative Service. Per Standing Order, Proposed Orders cannot have the word "Proposed" in the title of the Order. Please refile the Order only using event attachment and link to the Motion. Thank you. (zv) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Patrick M. Lafferty. Attorney added for Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brian J. Eutermoser. Attorney added for Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Britton F. Davis. Attorney added for Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey D. Mills for Patrick M. Lafferty ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15829138) by on behalf of Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc.. (Mills, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey D. Mills for Brian J. Eutermoser ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15829137) by on behalf of Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc.. (Mills, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey D. Mills for Britton F. Davis ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15829131) by on behalf of Open Text, Inc., Webroot, Inc.. (Mills, Jeffrey) |
| Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders and # COVID-19 standing order available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness for Patent Cases 030722,2. #Standing Order on Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases 030722,3. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings 4.0 - Patent Cases 030722,4. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Proceedings,5. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Joint Or Unopposed Request To Change Deadlines 030722,6. #Amended Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Public Versions 030722. (jkda) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mills, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15782914). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Webroot, Inc., Open Text, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Form AO 120)(Mills, Jeffrey) |
| All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/(jc5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (jc5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
