Fare Technologies, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fare Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., d/b/a UBER and Uber Technologies, Inc. doing business as UBER
Case Number: 6:2022cv00317
Filed: March 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Lisa M. Schoedel. Attorney added for Uber Technologies, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Yusuf Esat. Attorney added for Uber Technologies, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Benjamin J. Bradford. Attorney added for Uber Technologies, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot1)
May 11, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Melissa Richards Smith for L. Schoedel ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16021439) by on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
May 11, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Melissa Richards Smith for Y. Esat ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16021417) by on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
May 11, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Melissa Richards Smith for B. Bradford ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16021393) by on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Standing Order Regarding Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
April 12, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Smith, Melissa)
April 12, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Melissa Richards Smith on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc.. Attorney Melissa Richards Smith added to party Uber Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft) (Smith, Melissa)
April 12, 2022 Reset Deadlines: Uber Technologies, Inc. answer due 6/2/2022. (lad)
April 4, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fare Technologies, LLC. Uber Technologies, Inc. served on 3/28/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. (Ramey, William)
March 28, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies, Inc. (zv)
March 28, 2022 All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv)
March 25, 2022 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (zv)
March 25, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Fare Technologies, LLC. (Ramey, William)
March 25, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William)
March 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15857105), filed by Fare Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit US RE46727, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fare Technologies, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fare Technologies, LLC
Represented By: William P. Ramey, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., d/b/a UBER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. doing business as UBER
Represented By: Benjamin J. Bradford
Represented By: Lisa M. Schoedel
Represented By: Yusuf Esat
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?