LINFO IP, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Plaintiff: LINFO IP, LLC
Defendant: Nordstrom, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2022cv00373
Filed: April 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Referring Judge: Derek T Gilliland
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6) and 35 U.S.C. 101 by Nordstrom, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (Baldauf, Kent)
May 3, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Agreed Extension of Time to Respond by Nordstrom, Inc. re #1 Complaint (Baldauf, Kent)
May 3, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bryan P Clark on behalf of Nordstrom, Inc.. Attorney Bryan P Clark added to party Nordstrom, Inc.(pty:dft) (Clark, Bryan)
May 3, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kent E. Baldauf, Jr on behalf of Nordstrom, Inc.. Attorney Kent E. Baldauf, Jr added to party Nordstrom, Inc.(pty:dft) (Baldauf, Kent)
May 3, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Nordstrom, Inc. answer due 6/6/2022. (sm3)
April 19, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LINFO IP, LLC. Nordstrom, Inc. served on 4/14/2022, answer due 5/5/2022. (Ramey, William)
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Standing Order Regarding Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
April 13, 2022 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (lad)
April 13, 2022 Filing 5 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by LINFO IP, LLC. (Ramey, William). Called Plaintiff's counsel and informed that the JS44 form was incomplete. (zv).
April 13, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nordstrom, Inc. (sv)
April 13, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by LINFO IP, LLC. (Ramey, William)
April 13, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William)
April 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15921698), filed by LINFO IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit US9430131, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William)
April 13, 2022 All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/
April 13, 2022 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (sv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LINFO IP, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LINFO IP, LLC
Represented By: William P. Ramey, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nordstrom, Inc.
Represented By: Kent E. Baldauf, Jr.
Represented By: Bryan P Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?