Epistar Corporation v. AMAZON.COM. INC.
Plaintiff: Epistar Corporation
Defendant: AMAZON.COM. INC.
Case Number: 6:2022cv00526
Filed: May 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Referring Judge: Derek T Gilliland
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2022 Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases,2. #Amended Standing Order On Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases. (bot4)
September 7, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Answer of Otherwise Respond to Complaint by AMAZON.COM. INC. (Fountain, Aaron)
September 7, 2022 Reset Deadlines: AMAZON.COM. INC. answer due 10/27/2022. (lad)
August 23, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Epistar Corporation. AMAZON.COM. INC. served on 8/22/2022, answer due 9/12/2022. (Siegmund, Mark)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Johannes S. Hsu. Attorney added for Epistar Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot2)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Robert J. Benson. Attorney added for Epistar Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot2)
June 1, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mark D. Siegmund for Johannes S. Hsu ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16091477) by on behalf of Epistar Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (Siegmund, Mark)
June 1, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mark D. Siegmund for Robert J. Benson ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16091461) by on behalf of Epistar Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (Siegmund, Mark)
May 24, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to AMAZON.COM. INC.. (lad)
May 24, 2022 Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Epistar Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Ennostar, Incorporated for Epistar Corporation. (Siegmund, Mark)
May 24, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Epistar Corporation. (Siegmund, Mark)
May 24, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Siegmund, Mark)
May 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-16068298), filed by Epistar Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- US 8,492,780, #2 Exhibit 2- US 9,530,934, #3 Exhibit 3- US 10,199,542, #4 Exhibit 4- US 10,505,076, #5 Exhibit 5- US 9,257,604, #6 Exhibit 6- US 10,181,549, #7 Exhibit 7- US 10,522,715, #8 Exhibit 8- US 9,293,656, #9 Exhibit 9- US 9,893,257, #10 Exhibit 10- US 10,038,129, #11 Exhibit 11- US 8,963,123, #12 Exhibit 12- US 9,425,362, #13 Exhibit A- US 8492780 Claim Chart, #14 Exhibit B- US 9530934 Claim Chart, #15 Exhibit C- US 10199542 Claim Chart, #16 Exhibit D- US 10505076 Claim Chart, #17 Exhibit E- US 9257604 Claim Chart, #18 Exhibit F- US 10181549 Claim Chart, #19 Exhibit G- US 10522715 Claim Chart, #20 Exhibit H- US 9293656 Claim Chart, #21 Exhibit I- US 9893257 Claim Chart, #22 Exhibit J- US 10038129 Claim Chart, #23 Exhibit K- US 8963123 Claim Chart, #24 Exhibit L-US 9425362 Claim Chart, #25 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siegmund, Mark)
May 24, 2022 All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (lad)
May 24, 2022 Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE (lad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Epistar Corporation v. AMAZON.COM. INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Epistar Corporation
Represented By: Gregory Phillip Love
Represented By: Jeffrey Lance Johnson
Represented By: Mark D. Siegmund
Represented By: Johannes S. Hsu
Represented By: Robert J. Benson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMAZON.COM. INC.
Represented By: Aaron Fountain
Represented By: Stefani E. Shanberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?