Peter Pedersen v. Adobe, Inc.
| Peter Pedersen |
| Adobe, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv00583 |
| June 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Derek T Gilliland |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Agreed Extension of Time to File Answer by Adobe, Inc. (Siegmund, Mark) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Gregory Phillip Love on behalf of Adobe, Inc.. Attorney Gregory Phillip Love added to party Adobe, Inc.(pty:dft) (Love, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark D. Siegmund on behalf of Adobe, Inc.. Attorney Mark D. Siegmund added to party Adobe, Inc.(pty:dft) (Siegmund, Mark) |
| Reset Deadlines: Adobe, Inc. answer due 8/15/2022. (zv) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peter Pedersen. Adobe, Inc. served on 6/10/2022, answer due 7/1/2022. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Adobe, Inc.. (sm3) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by Peter Pedersen. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Peter Pedersen. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-16118426), filed by Peter Pedersen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit US6965920, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright and Judge Derek T. Gilliland. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (sm3) |
| Pursuant to the Standing Order Regarding Patent/Trademark Cases effective 12/9/19, attorneys filing Patent/Trademark cases in TXWD Waco division must prepare the attached form AO120, flatten the document and then e-file upon opening of the case using the event Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form. (sm3) |
| All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/ (sm3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peter Pedersen v. Adobe, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peter Pedersen | |
| Represented By: | Donald H. Mahoney, III |
| Represented By: | Kyril Vladimir Talanov |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Adobe, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Mark D. Siegmund |
| Represented By: | Gregory Phillip Love |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
