Signify North America Corporation et al v. EGLO Leuchten GmbH et al
Plaintiff: Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.
Defendant: EGLO Leuchten GmbH and EGLO Hong Kong Lighting Ltd.
Case Number: 6:2022cv00812
Filed: July 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alan D Albright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2022 Parties shall comply with Judge Albright's updated #standing orders available by clicking the included hyperlinks. The updated orders are as follows:1. #Standing Order Governing Proceedings Patent Cases,2. #Amended Standing Order On Pretrial Procedures and Requirements in Civil Cases. (bot4)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING #18 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Adam D. Swain. Attorney added for Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot2)
September 12, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Brady Randall Cox Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Adam D. Swain ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16512538) by on behalf of Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Cox, Brady)
August 17, 2022 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by EGLO Hong Kong Lighting Ltd., EGLO Leuchten GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kao, Christopher)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Philip Ducker for Signify Holding B.V. and Signify North America Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (zv)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Joshua D. Rice. Attorney added for Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order, if he/she has not previously done so for a prior case in this District. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bot2)
August 12, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Brady Randall Cox Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Phillip Ducker ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16398524) by on behalf of Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Cox, Brady)
August 12, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Brady Randall Cox Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Joshua D. Rice ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16398489) by on behalf of Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Cox, Brady)
August 12, 2022 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. EGLO Hong Kong Lighting Ltd. served on 8/6/2022, answer due 8/29/2022. (Cox, Brady)
August 5, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. EGLO Leuchten GmbH served on 8/1/2022, answer due 8/22/2022. (Cox, Brady)
August 1, 2022 Filing 10 Docs received in Clerk's Office for foreign service via FedEx. Pickup info included.(lad)
July 26, 2022 Filing 9 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Signify Holding B.V. and Signify North America Corporation for attorney Joshua D. Rice. (zv)
July 26, 2022 Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Signify Holding B.V. and Signify North America Corporation for attorney Philip Ducker. (zv)
July 26, 2022 Filing 7 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Signify Holding B.V. and Signify North America Corporation for attorney Adam D. Swain. (zv)
July 25, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to EGLO Leuchten GmbH. (zv)
July 25, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to EGLO Hong Kong Lighting Ltd. (zv)
July 25, 2022 All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/. (zv)
July 25, 2022 Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Signify N.V. for Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Cox, Brady)
July 25, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Cox, Brady)
July 25, 2022 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Cox, Brady)
July 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-16297367), filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cox, Brady)
July 25, 2022 Case RANDOMLY assigned to Judge Alan D Albright pursuant to the ORDER ASSIGNING BUSINESS OF THE COURT AS IT RELATES TO PATENT CASES, filed 7/25/2022. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Signify North America Corporation et al v. EGLO Leuchten GmbH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Signify North America Corporation
Represented By: Brady Randall Cox
Represented By: Adam D. Swain
Represented By: Joshua D. Rice
Represented By: Philip Ducker
Represented By: Theodore Stevenson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Signify Holding B.V.
Represented By: Brady Randall Cox
Represented By: Adam D. Swain
Represented By: Joshua D. Rice
Represented By: Philip Ducker
Represented By: Theodore Stevenson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EGLO Leuchten GmbH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EGLO Hong Kong Lighting Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?